Vision explained in the report that it had done an online survey of 4,000 people, and most of the donors understood that the money was donated to a place, not to the child in the picture on the sponsorship card. (Ms. Mussa said World Vision never promised sponsors that their money would directly support a specific child. Rather, the group pools the money for projects in the child's community. She said World Vision had conducted an online survey of 4,000 sponsors in which most said they understood the money was for the place, not the person in the picture.)
But for many donors, this is not the case. At popular database least Australian police Brendan said that he always thought his monthly donation was for children. He had previously received a letter from Vision stating that you are helping Othman with necessities, and this money is helping important developments in the Othman community. He felt that he was being misled and believed that the donors made donations based on their connection with the assisted children, including the photos of the assisted children provided by World Vision.
But the reality is that Brendan has no relationship with the sponsored children at all. He wrote so many Christmas cards in English to send to Othman. His family did not understand English at all, and it turned into a postcard from an alien. Even Othman did not know that Brendan existed. No wonder Brendan felt that The sponsorship experience made him sad.

